Master list for anti-feminism.

Hello and Welcome. This post is a masterpost of masterposts, we gathered all the big posts from various tumblr’s and sites with thousands of links all in one place. We have given credit to everything we have taken and we have no responsibility if the feminists that you show this to get triggered and pass out, die etc. Enjoy. Small note: I know there are a lot of duplicate links but this post is 19.500(21.600 atm) words long and I cant in no way look all of the links and sources.


 This is taken from my personal  blog but its originally from the tumblr http://egalitaria-n.tumblr.com/ (sadly the original post is deleted for some reason.)

Feminists fight to hurt men (not just radical feminists either) (this info is fromoratorasaurus) Father’s rights group want shared parenting (equal custody) to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. They feel that men should not be punished for being men, and that women should not be awarded custody to their kids simply for being women. Currently women are awarded primary custody almost all the time, even if the husband was the stay-at-home Dad and the woman was the breadwinner. Feminists fought against this. You can read NOW’s own statement here. Also note their usage of anti-male lies, i.e. “fathers are abusive, don’t give them custody.” That is from 1997, but still remains valid today. Men want protection against false rape allegations. They feel that a man’s life should not be ruined simply on the allegation of a woman who may be a vindictive liar. Currently, a woman can accuse a man of rape for no reason, and the man’s name is splashed in the paper and his life is ruined. So, they fought for laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged. Feminists fought against this, causing it to fail. Also see here, the London Feminist Network campaigning to defeat the proposal. “The London Feminist Network is a campaigning organisation uniting London based feminist groups and individuals in activism.” Men want an end to the justice system favouring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men. Feminists fought against this, arguing that no woman should be sent to jail, even women who had murdered multiple people. Men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies. Feminists fought against this by trying to suppress evidence showing that half of domestic violence is done by women, by threatening the researchers with bomb threats, death threats, etc. Modern, younger feminists are doing it as well. And sadly, they were successful in this effort of propaganda. For decades, and continuing today, violent men are (rightfully) convicted and punished by the state, while violent women are left to freely terrorize and harm their partners. The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting primarily in having only male batterers criminally pursued. Men want female rapists to be arrested, charged, and convicted with rape. In Western countries, women are rarely punished when raping men, due to the biased legal system. In some countries, women cannot be punished when raping men, since rape is defined as a male-perpetrated crime. Feminists fought against this in India, arguing that “there is a physicality [in] rape” and that it would make things “more complicated for judges.” Feminists fought against this in Israel, claiming that changing the law would result in men filing false rape claims. Men don’t want to be thrown in jail because they lost their jobs and temporarily cannot pay child support. Feminists fought against this, trying to lower the amount to $5000 before a man is guilty of a felony for not paying child support. If a man loses a decent-paying job, he will now be a felon, go to jail, lose his right to vote, AND be unable to find future jobs—if he cannot regain an equal-paying job within a few months. Men want equal economic support and help from the government. When the recession hit, male-dominated fields like construction lost millions of jobs, while female-fields like education and healthcare gained jobs. So the government proposed an economic stimulus for those fields. Feminists successfully fought against this, arguing that it was discrimination to support men, and caused the government to give money to women who didn’t deserve it. Hundreds of professional feminists complained against the “sexism” of helping men (who had lost jobs) and not women (who had gained jobs). A representative of the Michigan National Organization for Women testified in opposition to the Revocation of Paternity Act, which stopped the old law which stated that if a woman was married and cheated on her husband, the resulting child is considered to be legally the husband’s and the biological father had no legal rights to fight for custody or parenting time with his biological child. As you can see, the claim that feminism fight for men’s rights is a blatant lie. Don’t believe any feminists that say that. Feminists fight for women’s rights. That is a good thing. Feminists also are happy to harm men’s rights, as shown above. That is a bad thing. Feminism is about female privilege, not equality. Some may argue that these cases of feminists harming men is not “representative” of feminism. I ask you: Are there any cases of feminists helping men? No. Yet, there are many cases of feminists harming men. It is reasonable to conclude from these facts that feminism fights to harm men. This info is from draumbouy Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters. Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide. Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism. Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands. Propaganda campaign against male fathers wanting custody. Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted. Try to shut down female prisons. Create rape laws that exclude female rapists. Make it impossible to charge women with rape. Feminists against equal custody. Female felons should serve home sentences. Told judges to be lenient on women. Feminists cover up female domestic violence. Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men. Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education. Males who were raped as a child still have to pay child support. Women should have the right to put a child up for adoption before the father gets custody. Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists. 5 rights feminism ignores for men. Feminists blame males for their abuse. The primary aggressor clause where only men get charged with abuse. Shame men into going to war. Feminists dismiss female child rapists. Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse. Feminists mock a man who has his dick cut off. Strawmanning MRA members. feminists attack church. Feminists transphobia Feminists slander the MRM Again, And again, Call them terrorists. Feminists say Men can’t be raped. Feminists defend female raping minor. Feminist defends why fucking an 8 year old boy isn’t rape. Feminists primary aggressor clause discriminates against males. Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats. Woman smashing bottle in mans face in public. Nobody gives a fuck. Jezebel mocks men who are abused. Feminists make sure the gov doesn’t spend money on male shelters or male research. Female on male abuse in public is at best ignored, and at worst celebrated. Public stops a man from abusing a woman in public, same crowd laughs when the roles are reversed. No funding for male shelter. Founder of Canadas only male shelter for abuse forced to close due to lack of funding before committing suicide. Violent crimes? Only a few examples. One of which is their violent protest against Warren Farrell when he spoke in Toronto: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 Another would be this mob of pro-abortion Feminists in Argentina:http://www.lifesitenews.com/horror-mob-of-topless-pro-abort-feminists-attacks-rosary-praying-men-defend.html Feminists disrupt a forum for battered men: http://youtu.be/qodygTkTUYM Tumblr users sarah-bunny and feminism-is-your-friend harass and DOXX an Asexual rape victim:http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/78589971327/abbeyxmae-serebrii Tumblr user manhatingfeminist tells a user to kill themselves:http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/78734991790/you-need-to-kill-yourself-lol Tumblr user musemorplsunerd defends a woman who raped an 8 year old boy:http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/81918411593/you-do-realize-that-8-year-olds-cannot-give-any-kind-of Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters. Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide. Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism. many feminist leaders were borderline genercidal. In fact Valerie Solanas, who helped to shape modern patriarchy theory, and who’s writing is still taught today in womens studies classes, not only attempted to assassinate Andy Warhol, but also wrote a book called the S.C.U.M. Manifesto (or feminist Mein Kompf), which was about gendercide, and she is still hailed as a feminist hero to this day. this book is still used in womens studies classes despite the fact that it proposes reducing the male population to 10% and using them for breeding purposes. men actually have less rights than women. men are also demonized as rapists due to unequal rape laws that favor women. when you analyze the situation you’ll find that women rape almost as often as men (about 40% of rapists are women) and men are raped just as often if not more than women. In 2008, a law was passed in England and Wales that allowed long-term domestic violence victims who killed their abuser to be charged with the lesser charge of manslaughter, but this only applies to women. In California and Montana, a woman can name any man she likes as the father, he gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the father within 30 days he is now the father and must pay. He cannot contest it. And DNA tests to prove paternity are not considered proof by the courts. Women who falsely accuse a man of rape, who would be sent to prison for 10+ years if convicted, only gets fined or a slap on the wrist. There is also the gender bias in the Probation Departments: A higher score on the Probation Assessment Tool (PAT) means a recommendation that could lead to eventual dismissal of charges. A lower score means probation or lockup, not to mention the juvenile delinquent tag. [Judge] Hunt claims PAT routinely rewards girls with 14 extra points for gender alone, while boys get 0. Then there are studies that show women who fail to pay child support are incarcerated only 1/8th as often as men with similar violations. The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting in having mostly male batterers criminally pursued, and female batterers left alone. Men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged – their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one.

Feminists say Men can’t be raped.






The following part is taken from tumblr http://check-your-privilege-feminists.tumblr.com/post/95979451581/i-dont-understand-how-are-you-not-a-feminist  it is a response to the stupid question:I don’t understand, how are you not a feminist?

First of all, this is how the current feminist movement looks right now tumblr_n79qpiJjn51tb1gaqo1_500 tumblr_n79qpiJjn51tb1gaqo2_1280 tumblr_na5m0iTpM31tb1gaqo3_500 tumblr_n79qpiJjn51tb1gaqo4_500 tumblr_n79qpiJjn51tb1gaqo5_400 tumblr_inline_n6psjzLJo01ssrue3 tumblr_inline_n5sez4Pozx1ssrue3 tumblr_n79qpiJjn51tb1gaqo9_1280 (1) tumblr_inline_n6psjwIh5M1ssrue3 Sure, these are probably what you’d call “misandrists” just giving a bad name to feminism. You’re right, I’m willing to look past all that and actually look at what feminism is really about, at a more intellectual and institutional level. Here are some quotes by some prominent feminists:

  • “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” — Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
  • “I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.” — Robin Morgan
  • “To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” — Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto
  • “The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness…can be trained to do most things.” — Jilly Cooper, SCUM
  • “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: I am.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins
  • “All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French, Authoress
  • “The annihilation of a woman’s personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it. They embrace murder as if life without it would be devoid of passion, meaning, and action, as if murder were solace, stilling their sobs as they mourn the emptiness and alienation of their lives.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it ‘Her’. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination.” — Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women
  • “On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom.” — Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women.
  • “The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist — Ti-Grace Atkinson
  • ”Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.” — Ti-Grace Atkinson
  • “Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” — Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6
  • “When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression.” — Sheila Jeffrys
  • “Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated.”— Catherine MacKinnon
  • “All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman.” — Catherine MacKinnon
  • “You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs.” — Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.)

I guess you ladies on tumblr should probably address that as “problematic” or at least acknowledge the people that walk among you. But whatever. Those are just a few dumbasses and I should probably be looking more at feminism as a whole, collective ideology. What’s usually one of the first things feminists list as a reason for why they need feminism or why they’re feminists? That women are still  making 77¢ for every $1 that men do. Hard to believe that in 2014 we’re still dealing with this problem, right? We’re not.

In 1963, President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act, which stated the following: I AM delighted today to approve the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which prohibits arbitrary discrimination against women in the payment of wages. This act represents many years of effort by labor, management, and several private organizations unassociated with labor or management, to call attention to the unconscionable practice of paying female employees less wages than male employees for the same job. This measure adds to our laws another structure basic to democracy. It will add protection at the working place to the women, the same rights at the working place in a sense that they have enjoyed at the polling place. This Act granted working women the same rights as that of the working man, thereby enjoying the right to equal pay. Next year, Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in which Section 703(a) defines the following employer practices as unlawful: (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Essentially banning discrimination of wages based on sex. Here is a comprehensive look at the wage gap issue, prepared for the government specifically, 95 pages. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Here are some by women http://www.payscale.com/career-news/2009/12/do-men-or-women-choose-majors-to-maximize-income http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html US Department of Labor http://social.dol.gov/blog/myth-busting-the-pay-gap/ The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/ Gender pay gap is not what activists claim http://wwww.examiner.com/x-22884-Canada-Politics-Examiner~y2010m2d22-Gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim Equal pay statistics are bogus because they don’t compare like with like http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html Fair Pay Isn’t Always Equal Pay http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hp The Wage Gap Myth http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/the_wage_gap_myth.html Don’t Blame Discrimination for Gender Wage Gap http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-13/don-t-blame-discrimination-for-gender-wage-gap.html The pay inequality myth: Women are more equal than you think http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa3pKN3XUKM&feature=youtu.be Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html?_r=2 Labor force participation rate for men has never been lower. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/biggest-shock-fridays-payroll-report-sorry-men Share of Men in Labor Force at All-Time Low http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/share-of-men-in-labor-force-at-all-time-low/?src=recg Women In Tech Make More Money And Land Better Jobs Than Men http://www.businessinsider.com/women-in-tech-make-more-money-and-land-better-jobs-than-men-2010-9 Female U.S. corporate directors out-earn men: study www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedType=R Female CEOs outearned men in 2009. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=10630664 Women between ages 21 and 30 working full-time made 117% of men’s wages. www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slogin According to the U.S. Census Bureau, single women between 22 and 30 years old earn an average of $27,000 a year. That’s 8% more than comparable men. http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/Young-Women-Earn-More-159818705.html Workplace Salaries: At Last, Women on Top http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html Young Women’s Pay Exceeds Male Peers http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704421104575463790770831192.html The 15 Jobs Where Women Earn More Than Men http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/03/14/jobs-where-women-earn-more-than-men/ women aged between 22 and 29 earn over £10 per hour on average, compared to men their same age who earn just under this amount. http://www.womenintechnology.co.uk/news/young-women-earn-more-than-men—news-800761492 Young women now earn more than men in UK http://www.womensviewsonnews.org/2011/10/young-women-now-earn-more-than-men-in-uk/ The only chairwoman in the FTSE 100 index of biggest British companies, when asked about government efforts to force companies to make at least 25% of board member to be female said: “there’s no real evidence to suggest women being on a board makes the companies any better – what we’re doing here is forcing an experiment.” This was further supported in the book “Why Men Earn More” by Warren Farrell, Ph.D., examined 25 career/life choices men and women make (hours, commute times, etc.) that lead to men earning more and women having more balanced lives, and that showed how men in surveys prioritize money while women prioritize flexibility, shorter hours, shorter commutes, less physical risk and other factors conducive to their choice to be primary parents, an option men still largely don’t have. That is why never-married childless women outearn their male counterparts, and female corporate directors now outearn their male counterparts. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedTy… Farrell also lists dozens of careers, including fields of science, where women outearn men. Women simply have more options than men to be primary parents, and many of them exercise that option rather than work long, stressful hours. That is why 57% of female graduates of Stanford and Harvard left the workforce within 15 years of entry into the workforce. http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/ This is an option few men have (try being a single male and telling women on the first date that you want to stay home). Blaming men for women’s choices is unfair. In fact research shows most men have no problem with their wives outearning them. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23413243 Research also shows most working dads would quit or take a pay cut to spend more time with kids if their spouses could support the family. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html Research also shows that parents share workloads more when mothers allow men to be primary parents. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm ABC News: “Is the Wage Gap Women’s Choice? Research Suggests Career Decisions, Not Sex Bias, Are at Root of Pay Disparity” http://abcnews.go.com/2020/GiveMeABreak/story?id=797045&page=1&CMP=OTC-R There is also the myth that women are kept out of certain more lucrative fields by sexism. The truth is that women stay away from math out of their own free choice http://sify.com/news/women-stay-away-from-math-out-of-their-own-free-choice-news-scitech-kk1lubiiiee.html Women In Science: No Discrimination, Says Cornell Study http://www.science20.com/news_articles/women_science_no_discrimination_says_cornell_study-75984 Let’s be real about the lack of women in tech http://www.businessinsider.com/lets-be-real-about-the-lack-of-women-in-tech-2010-10 Here are some by women http://www.payscale.com/career-news/2009/12/do-men-or-women-choose-majors-to-maximize-income http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html US Department of Labor http://social.dol.gov/blog/myth-busting-the-pay-gap/

Okay, so that’s not really as big of an issue as feminists claimed it was. However, I absolutely agree that if you do find out that you are being discriminated in the workplace due to your gender, you can and should take action to end that. So what else is a big issue in feminism? Rape culture. Rape is a serious problem, make no mistake. But is this “rape culture” hysteria the answer? Do we honestly live in a culture in which prevalent attitudes and practices normalize, excuse, tolerate, and even condone rape? It’s difficult to quite agree with that idea. While rape unfortunately does happen, it is still seen as one of the top criminal offenses in our country (at least in the US). It’s actually treated like a really serious issue, probably more than any other crime. Compared to joking about rape, how often do we hear people joking about murder? Far more. In fact there’s a big popular post right here on tumblr with details on how to commit murder and get away with it. Does that mean that people seeing those kinds of twisted and sarcastic things are suddenly more inclined to commit murder? I’d hope not. Are those kind of jokes creating a murder culture? Not really. But maybe because 1 in 4 (or 1 in 5 or 1 in 6, it changes every time I come on tumblr) women will be raped or sexually assaulted in her lifetime. That’s a pretty damn high number. And that’s because it isn’t accurate. tumblr_n7dqytmPWk1qf9djko1_500 tumblr_n7dqytmPWk1qf9djko2_r1_500 IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportionsNo crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.” — Heather Mac Donald, “The Campus Rape Myth”. This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:

  1. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
  2. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
  3. Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?

The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors. Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering. Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades – up to 80% since 1979despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice. The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe. Here’s what RAINN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network), one of the most trusted sources of sexual violence information and resources in the nation, has had to say about the idea of “rape culture” tumblr_n30ee9rjw41ttay5mo2_1280 Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence. Oh yeah, moving on to the violence stuff that feminism likes to talk about. tumblr_n68qb9ciun1tb1gaqo1_1280 Remember the whole Elliot Rodger incident? Feminists used that tragedy to highlight the supposed rampant misogyny in society. The crimes that have been committed by sick individuals like Elliot Rodger are horrible, no one is arguing about that. But is it really good to use those isolated incidences to further your own agenda? If so, then these other incidences would also make it clear that there is a huge problem of female perpetrated violence and misandry in society as well: tumblr_inline_n7edbzy4oO1s73i0x tumblr_inline_n7ede6mhuv1s73i0x tumblr_inline_n7edieZbo61s73i0x Comedian Phil Hartman was murdered by his wife on May 27th 1998 tumblr_inline_n7ee3lK3jg1s73i0x NFL player Steve McNair was murdered by his girlfriend on July 4th, 2009 tumblr_inline_n7ee4k3NRm1s73i0xJohn Wayne Bobbitt had his penis cut completely off on June 23rd, 1993 tumblr_inline_n7ee5nyykj1s73i0x Travis Alexander was murdered by Jodi Arias on June 4th, 2008 tumblr_inline_n7ee6kzvA11s73i0x Andrew Bagby was murdered by Shirley Jane Turner on November 6th, 2001 (She later murdered their 1 year-old son on August 18th, 2003) tumblr_inline_n7ee7s7wY61s73i0xtumblr_inline_n7ee8pL3mj1s73i0x Brenda Spencer killed two and injured nine at Cleveland Elementary School on January 29th, 1979 tumblr_inline_n7ee9tFZJx1s73i0x Laurie Dann killed one boy and injured five others at Hubbard Woods Elementary School on May 20th, 1988 tumblr_inline_n7eearhTnE1s73i0x Jennifer San Marco killed eight people at Goleta postal facility on January 30th, 2006 tumblr_inline_n7eebzojQ41s73i0x Sylvia Seegrist killed three and injured seven during a shooting spree at a Springfield mall on October 30th, 1985 tumblr_inline_n7eecwfpYJ1s73i0x Mary Ann Holder killed five children including her own son in Pleasent Gardens, NC on November 20th, 2011 tumblr_inline_n7eedwY19R1s73i0x Jullian Robbins killed one and injured two at Penn State on September 17th, 1997 tumblr_inline_n7eeew3F1t1s73i0x Heather Smith killed two then committed suicide at Spanaway Junior High School on November 26th, 1985 tumblr_inline_n7eeh7q6DB1s73i0x Latina Williams killed two others then self at Louisiana Technical College on February 8th, 2008 tumblr_inline_n7eei5vOMr1s73i0x Amy Bishop Anderson killed three and wounded three others at the University of Alabama on February 12th, 2010 tumblr_inline_n7eejeg0gQ1s73i0x

Wow, almost like violence is not so much a gendered issue and is more of a human issue,. Maybe instead of using tragedies to push an agenda and demonize an entire gender, we should focus on the real problem of violence as a whole. Feminists also like to talk about how girls are less confident than boys and suffer from lower self-esteem. That’s totally not cool and I agree that we should be doing something about that. But not like this tumblr_n9ju564jJ31tb1gaqo3_500 tumblr_n9ju564jJ31tb1gaqo2_500 tumblr_n9ju564jJ31tb1gaqo1_500 Really ladies, are you all still in middle school? Why do you have to bring others down just to feel tall? Why can’t we build each other up as equals instead of tearing each other down? And then you want to go and Ban Bossy™ because that’s gonna solve your problems? What even is the real issue again? Let’s list it out the way feminists did (this was originally in an infographic) tumblr_n383mifXUq1rxkwwto1_500 tumblr_n383mifXUq1rxkwwto2_500 tumblr_n383mifXUq1rxkwwto3_400 This isn’t actually true. Girl Scouts own website on Education:

  • Female kindergarteners (83%) are somewhat more likely than their male counterparts (79%) to exhibit the following positive social behaviors: ease in joining others in play; ability to make and keep friends; and positively interacting with peers.(ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Kindergartners’ Social Interaction Skills, 2006)
  • In 2005, female fourth- and eighth-graders both scored higher on average in reading than their male counterparts. (National Center for Education Statistics, The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2005)
  • A slightly higher percentage of females than males completed high school in 2005 (87% compared with 85%, respectively). In 2005, females were also more likely than males to have completed some college (62% compared with 52%, respectively) and to have received at least a bachelor’s degree (32% compared with 26%, respectively). (ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Educational Attainment, 2006)
  • In 2004, 9% of females ages 16 to 24 were high school dropouts, compared with 12% of males. Females comprise one-half of the population and make up 43% of the dropouts in this age group. (ChildTrends.org,Child and Youth Indicators Databank: High School Dropout Rates, 2006)
  • In 2000, sex differences occurred in science course taking but not in mathematics. More females than males completed courses in advanced biology, Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) biology, and chemistry. Males completed physics and AP/IB physics courses at higher rates than females. (National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006)
  • In 2000, women earned more than half of the degrees awarded in psychology (78%), biological/agricultural sciences (59%), and social sciences (55%), and almost half (47%) in mathematics.However, women received 21% of bachelors degrees awarded in engineering, 27% in computer sciences, and 43% in physical sciences. (National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006)
  • For girls ages 8-12, aspirations after high school are largely educational and professional: 93% for college education; 76% for a career; 67% for marriage; and, 63% for children. (The Girl Scout Research Institute,Teens Before Their Time (2000))

On Civic Engagement and Volunteering:

  • For girls ages 11-12, 73% reported improving the world around them as their favorite activity (i.e., activities related to the environment or helping others). (The Girl Scout Research Institute, The Ten Emerging Truths: New Directions for Girls 11-17 (2002))
  • Girls ages 11-17 participate in student government at markedly increasing levels: 5% of girls ages 11-13; 12% of girls ages 13-15; and 20% of girls ages 16-17. (The Girl Scout Research Institute, The Ten Emerging Truths: New Directions for Girls 11-17 (2002))
  • More young women aged 15 to 25 participate in the following activities than young men: raising money for charity (27% for women vs. 22% for men); regular volunteering for non-political groups (21% vs. 16%); active group membership (22% vs. 18%); membership in political groups (17% vs. 15%); and, participating in a run/walk/ride for charity (20% vs. 15%). (Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, The Civic and Political Health of a Nation, 2006)
  • In the 2004 election, 55% of females ages 18-24 reported registering to vote, compared with 48% of males the same age. Similarly, 45% of females reported actually voting, compared with 39% of males. (ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Youth Voting, 2006)
  • From 1990 to 2000, consistent young volunteers were more likely to be female (14 percent) than male (11 percent). They were also more likely to be from higher SES households. (National Center for Education Statistics, Volunteer Service by Young People from High School through Early Adulthood, 2003)
  • From 1990 to 2000, females (50%) were more likely than males (38%) to volunteer in high school, but no differences were detected between the sexes two years out of high school (38% for males and 39% for females). Male volunteering declined further to 29% by the eighth year after scheduled high school graduation; no change was detected in female volunteering (37%). (National Center for Education Statistics, Volunteer Service by Young People from High School through Early Adulthood, 2003)
  • As of 2003, female college graduates were more likely than their male counterparts to have volunteered in the past year (50% vs. 43%). Among those who had volunteered, women were more likely than men to have served in educational or religious institutions, while men were more likely than women to have done other volunteer work with children or to have participated in poverty or neighborhood improvement projects. (National Center for Education Statistics, Where Are They Now? A Description of 1992–93 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients 10 Years Later, 2006)
  • College students follow the national trend in volunteering, with females (33%) volunteering at a higher rate than males (26.8%).Both male and female college students were more likely to volunteer for an educational or youth services organization than any other type of organization: 33.6% of male college students, and 30.2% of female college students volunteered at an educational or youth services organization. With a little over 22% of both male and female college students, religious organizations remained the second most popular place for volunteering among both genders. (Corporation for National and Community Service, College Students Helping America, 2006)
  •  The Gender Equality Paradox proves that this is not socially enforced but rather because the minds of boys and girls are different it is natural for girls and boys to have separate interests and abilities.

Do girls really have it all worse than boys? tumblr_n1aqygoy4Y1sfidr4o1_1280

You know, feminists claim to be helping men too, but when men feel that their issues are still not being adequately addressed and form their own groups like the MRM (which no, I’m not a part of), feminists do this to try to shut it down. What else has feminism done?

And here’s my final beef with feminism: If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear? (#YesAllWomen) How are you supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims? How are you encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves? How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us? tumblr_inline_nb06syDjeA1s73i0x tumblr_inline_nb06o56EZy1s73i0x tumblr_inline_nb06p3Mc211s73i0x tumblr_inline_nb06qgmBlG1s73i0x tumblr_inline_nb06r93bcG1s73i0x tumblr_inline_nb06s1nRMq1s73i0x Feminism is operating under too many problematic ideas, lies, and cover ups. Third wave feminism is ridiculous. It’s gotten too extreme and completely misses the point of equality now. I believe in equality, and for that reason I can no longer get behind an ideological movement like feminism. There’s my reasons. Goodbye everybody. Have a marvelous rest of your lives.






the following is from http://realsexism.tumblr.com/post/119173907255/feminism-lies-about-rape

Feminists will often claim women never lie about rape. This is a lie.

Around half of all rape allegations are false.

False allegations are common. 9.7% of people surveyed in an anonymous phone survey reported they had had some sort of false accusation made against them. Based on DNA the rate of false conviction/incarceration for rape is between 8-15%.  When sexual assault convictions were isolated, DNA testing eliminated between 8 and 15 percent of convicted offenders and supported exoneration. The real ratio of falsely arrested could be even higher. Feminists have lied about rape statistics.

They then use this rape hysteria to blame men in the crusade to fight this imaginary rape culture while ignoring the fact that the vast majority of convicted rapists have been abused by women. (usually as young children) tumblr_inline_nohglryQNN1t0wg8v_500 They ignore the epidemic of child abuse that is vastly larger because it is mainly perpetrated by women, while blaming men for the by-product. The number of reported cases of child abuse in 2012 were 7.5 times greater than the number of reported rapes.  tumblr_inline_nohgvowjwi1t0wg8v_500 In fact the only place where there is a rape culture and a 1 in 5 rape statistic or greater is in prisons, military interrogation centres, POW camps & some war zones. The victims of the most serious assaults are almost always men. One in five male inmates in America said they’d had a pressured or forced sexual encounter while incarcerated, one study found. In South Africa’s overcrowded, under-funded prisons, rape and sexual violence are used to define and maintain a strict social hierarchy in which “victims are humiliated, dominated and feminized,”  Twenty-one per cent of Sri Lankan males who were seen at a London torture treatment centre reported sexual abuse while in detention. In El Salvador, 76% of male political prisoners surveyed in the 1980s described at least one incidence of sexual torture. A study of 6,000 concentration-camp inmates in Sarajevo found that 80% of men reported having been raped. Rape of men is very common in combat zones.

Eleven rebels waited in a queue and raped Jean Paul in turn. When he was too exhausted to hold himself up, the next attacker would wrap his arm under Jean Paul’s hips and lift him by the stomach. He bled freely: “Many, many, many bleeding,” he says, “I could feel it like water.” Each of the male prisoners was raped 11 times that night and every night that followed.

The research by Lara Stemple at the University of California doesn’t only show that male sexual violence is a component of wars all over the world, it also suggests that international aid organisations are failing male victims. Her study cites a review of 4,076 NGOs that have addressed wartime sexual violence. Only 3% of them mentioned the experience of men in their literature. “Typically,” Stemple says, “as a passing reference.” “International human rights law leaves out men in nearly all instruments designed to address sexual violence,” she continues. “The UN Security Council Resolution 1325 in 2000 treats wartime sexual violence as something that only impacts on women and girls… Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced $44m to implement this resolution. Because of its entirely exclusive focus on female victims, it seems unlikely that any of these new funds will reach the thousands of men and boys who suffer from this kind of abuse. In fact men are the majority of rape victims in the USA if you include prisons and are often repeatedly anally raped with no chance of escaping from the people raping them. In some states 1 in 8 men in prison have been jailed because they are unable to pay child support The victims of the most serious forms of rape are ignored by a society that thinks its moral to take someone’s kids from them and lock them up in one of the few places there is a rape culture. Feminism’s crusade against men has used false rape statistics to distract from the real victims while ignoring the root cause of rape and the larger epidemic of child abuse. In the war on men, feminism has used rape as a weapon.






This  is from the real sexism project which is an incredible site you can check it our here http://www.realsexism.com/

The Real Sexism Project

Welcome to The Real Sexism Project. Despite what you have been told, in the western world today almost all legal and lethal sexual discrimination is against men. Men are 97% of combat fatalities. Men pay 97% of Alimony Men make 94% of work suicides. Men make up 93% of work fatalities. Men make up 81% of all war deaths. Men lose custody in 84% of divorces. 80% of all suicides are men. 77% of homicide victims are men. 89% of men will be the victim of at least one violent crime. Men are over twice as victimised by strangers as women. Men are 165% more likely to be convicted than women. Men get 63% longer sentences than women for the same crime. Court bias against men is at least 6 times bigger than racial bias. Males are discriminated against in school and University. Boys face vastly more corporal punishment than girls. 60-80% of the homeless are men. Women’s Cancers receive 15 times more funding than men’s At least 10% of fathers are victims of paternity fraud. One third of all fathers in the USA have lost custody of children, most are expected to pay for this. 40-70% of domestic violence is against men however less than 1% of domestic violence shelter spaces are for men. Male fatality rates are vastly higher than women’s Worldwide there are 107 men born for every 100 women, by age 65 there are 78 men for every 100 women, in countries like the USA & UK, its even worse, with 75/76 men for every 100 women. Despite the fact that health care spending for men is nearly twice as effective. In the few countries that have a majority male population and a preference for male children like China, Sons are legally obliged to care for parents when they are older, where as daughters are not. Many other countries like India have this as a social obligation. goo.gl/iZUcJJ Despite all the pressures and risks facing men today support services for men are almost non existent compared to services for women. There are departments for women’s issues in the White House and the UN, but none for men. The UN promotes genital mutilation of male children but condems female genital mutilation. This is Real Sexism. THE REAL MONEY GAP. Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Men only spend 40% of what they earn after tax. In contrast women make up 38.5% of all income but control 75% of domestic spending, women on average spend 90%MORE MONEY THAN THEY EARN. Men are exploited as cash machines and even with spending on children accounted for women still spend more money on themselves than the combined spending for men and children. This can even be observed in the floor space allocated to women’s products in most shopping centres. TAX & HEALTHCARE DISCRIMINATION Men pay over 70% of income tax but the vast majority of public spending is on services for women. There is more money spent on breast cancer than lung cancer and prostate cancer combined, despite the fact that lung cancer alone has 3-4 times more fatalities than breast cancer. A man’s chance of getting cancer is 44% and 23% of men will die from cancer, 38% of women get cancer and 19% die. Yet there is vastly more money spent on cancer for women, this is lethal discrimination. Women pay 60% less tax despite spending 300% more in domestic spending than men. Women also consume two third of public spending, there are 3 times the amount of gender specific health services for women than men despite the fact that for equal increases in health spending a man’s life expectancy rate increases nearly twice as much as a woman’s. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE There are hundreds of surveys which shows women are as violent if not more violent than men in domestic violence cases. Men get arrested in 85% of all arrests but its estimated that Women are the perpetrators in most Domestic Violence cases. Most reciprocal violence is started by women and 70% of non reciprocal violence is perpetrated by women. Women however only get arrested in 15% of all DV arrests. This example of 572 different studies covering 371,600 people demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm More men than women were victims of intimate partner physical violence and over 40% of severe physical violence was directed at men. http://www.batteredmen.com/NISVS.htm Despite this though,99.3% of DV shelter spaces are for women and even men who report violence against them by women are arrested far more often than the woman who is attacking them. bkpam293229_1366209889001

Gynocentric Sexism

Gynocentricism is the scientifically proven fact that almost every man, woman and child has been raised and instilled with a woman’s point of view. Men are taught to give women special treatment from birth and women are taught to expect preferential treatment from from men. Gynocentricism is by definition sexist however it has become the default social model for most of the planet. Men are trained to suppress emotions and always be considerate of a woman’s feelings, men are trained to sacrifice, work and die to provide for women’s happiness. Men and women are trained to always take the woman’s side over a man. Women are taught to support each other and view men’s pain and suffering as less important. Men are taught that fighting, dying and sacrificing themselves is noble but women experiencing any emotional distress is terrible. This sexist attitude and maternal brainwashing has seen men literally dying to protect women who quite often take the sacrifices men make completely for granted. This is real sexism and it is taught at a very early age and reinforced in our society through society, the media, education and legal system. bkpam293229_mens-rights http://image.basekit.com/bkpam293229_double-standards1.jpeg

Government Sponsored Sexism

1) Real sexism is almost no shelters for male victims of domestic violence. 2) Real sexism is men getting harsher punishments for the same crime. 3) Real sexism is countries with compulsorily military service for men. 4) Real sexism, courts that takes children from fathers based on gender. 5) Men cannot even vote or get citizenship without enrolling for the draft. 6) Real sexism is numerous government departments dealing with women’s issues but none dealing with men’s issues. 7) Male infant circumcision/genital mutilation is legal and performed widely and even completely socially accepted but female genital mutilation is not. 8) A young boy raped by a woman can be forced to pay child support to his rapist if she gets pregnant, that’s real sexism. 9) Many countries do not even recognize female on male rape. It can maximally only amount to “sexual assault” that’s real sexism. 10) Real sexism is having no special laws like VAWA to protect men, even though men are the majority of victims of violent crime. 11) There are drives to fill quotas for women for the high paid roles but not in the dangerous jobs dominated by men, thats real sexism. 12) In the army, police, fire service or any other position women have to meet much lower physical standards than men. 13) Real sexism is services for men only given a fraction of the funds that services for women are given at a government and a social level. 14) For the same crime, irrespective of the gender of the offender, the perpetrator gets more punishment if the victim is female rather than male. 15) Most divorce laws are skewed against men, men can lose half his properly, money and children to a woman who decides to leave him. He is expected to pay for this betrayal, especially if he has already provided for and supported her, this is real sexism.

Social sexism against men

16) Real sexism is being mocked when raped because you’re a man. 17) Men are expected to not show emotion and remain stoic at all times. 18) Victim blaming is acceptable ONLY when men are the victims and women the perpetrator. This is real sexism. 19) Real sexism is having your gender stereotyped by society as being violent, abusers, etc. 20) Men’s lives are given less value in any emergency situation. 21) Male children are often given harsher punishments by teachers for the same level of mischief as girls. 22) Young boys are given less care and attention by parents than girls and beaten over twice as often as girls by parents. 23) Violence against men by women is much more socially acceptable. 24) Affirmative action for women only in jobs, education, grants, etc. 25) Men enrolled in are often given tougher, more dangerous tasks to perform than women in the same post (in a job) This is real sexism. 27) Males who complain about being objectified are shamed as being “mentally fragile” or their sexuality is questioned. This is real sexism. 28) Men do not have the privilege of showing affection to each other in public as women without people questioning their sexuality. 29) Men are expected to ask women out, pay for dates, decide on the venue – if she rejects him he is often labelled creepy or needy. 30) If a man slaps a woman, he is an abuser and a monster, If a woman slaps a man, “he must have done something to annoy her” 31) When a man breaks up with a woman, he is called a “jerk”. When a woman dumps a man, “he must have failed her somehow” 32) Men are excluded from many positions such as babysitters, etc. 33) Young men having to pay higher car insurance is acceptable but the idea of women having to pay more for health insurance is not. 34) Despite the fact that the real victims of sexual discrimination are men the term sexual discrimination usually excludes men and the vast majority of surveys and news stories about sexual discrimination dont include men. 35) Our culture and media makes the assumption of men as guilty, violent offenders where as women are given special treatment at every turn. 36) In modern movies and TV violence against men is glorified but violence against women is regarded as especially horrific. 37) Many news reports will read the number of people killed and then highlight women and children as more tragic than male death. EG: “37 people were killed in a bus crash including 17 women” 38) Men are expected to carry heavy things for women, give up their seats for women, shovel snow, mow gardens and do any other job involving manual labour, that women do not wish to perform. 39) Real sexism is a society where men are taught that a man’s role is to work, provide, pay and die in order to ensure a woman’s happiness. 40) Real sexism is the fact that men working longer hours in harder more dangerous jobs to earn more money to pay for women’s choices is being turned into a weapon against men. bkpam293229_women-marry-for-money http://www.businessinsider.com/causes-of-low-marriage-rates-2014-5 70% of UK women would instantly change their minds about leaving a boring man if he won a lottery jackpot. 78% of US women said a partner with a steady job was the most important trait in a future spouse75% said they’d have a problem with dating someone without a job. Only 4% would go out with an unemployed man. 70% of Chinese women expect a man to provide an apartment along with a cash marriage offer. bkpam293229_cashpoint bkpam293229_real-sexism Feminism Debunked “The Wage Gap”

Domestic Violence

Rape Culture

Mens Issues

Female Privilege

Feminists being horrible

More

bkpam293229_real-sexism-kills_1 bkpam293229_single-father-mother bkpam293229_fatherless-children http://www.deltabravo.net/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.284 Ask any decent mother would she prefer being raped or having her children taken from her and any decent mother picks the former. Now ask her to pay for having her children taken from her and threaten her with incarceration paid for with her own tax money in a building where she has a large chance of being anally raped while stuck in the building with the people attacking her, never able to hold her child’s hand. This is what millions of fathers across the world face. This is just one example of real sexism that men face today. This is real sexism, and the victims are men. Men are being discriminated in education, the law, society, losing children, dying and having lives destroyed because of real sexism. Sexism against women in the western world results in hurt feelings, sexism against men destroys lives and is often lethal. Learn more on our Facebook. Follow us on Twitter. Share the this page using links below, Donate or Tell us your story, Email: Realsexism@gmail.com this next piece is from the  A Voice for Men about page http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism/about/

Facts

Important Note This page underwent complete overhaul on 16 June 2014 and was provided by the fine folks at Cultural Misandry.com. However, those seeking more information, or to add important data not in this page, which is only updated sporadically, should see the  primary Research page of the AVfM Reference Wiki. If you spot errors on this page please let us know but be aware that the Wiki is more frequently and readily updated, and we are always looking for volunteers to help improve it. –DE

The Facts about Male Discrimination

Precious little discussion happens around issues that affect men, this is especially true in “gender” (aka women’s) studies courses in college. For the few men who already know about these issues, this will be an excellent page to link to in order to debunk the idea that men have it so good compared to women. And for those, who are open-minded (no feminists, that is not you), but don’t know the issues then this list will hopefully be a wake up call for you to, in the words of Men’s Rights advocates, “take the red pill.” Rape Laws and Policies

  • The April 4th “Dear Colleague” letter issued by the OCR to all colleges that receive federal funding, reduces the standard of proof required to convict a male student of rape all the way down to “preponderance of evidence” (anything above 50%) and “strongly discourages” male students being given the right to question their accuser. The directive also requires all universities to allow alleged victims of rape to appeal the results of college disciplinary hearings, subjecting the accused to “double jeopardy” (which isn’t allowed in US courts).

http://www.thefire.org/frequently-asked-questions-ocrs-april-4-dear-colleague-guidance-letter/ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576516232905230642.html Click to see victims of this policy

  • U.S. Military, Washington State and the District of Columbia put the burden on the accused to show consent.

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/09/us-military-dc-and-washington-state-now.html

  • Federal Rule of Evidence 413 allows rape defendants’ prior sexual assault misconduct to be admitted as evidence in federal rape trials. This infringes on defendants’ constitutional equal protection and due process rights. Rule 413 departs from long-standing legal tradition prohibiting admissions of a defendants’ uncharged misconduct evidence to prove criminal propensities. This makes it so men who are accused of rape, are afforded less protections than any other crime.

http://law-journals-books.vlex.com/vid/federal-rule-evidence-dangerous-frontier-53568721 http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/culr/2012/11/28/repeal-rule-413-of-the-federal-rules-of-evidence/

  • Military charges more men with bogus rape claims to show that it takes sexual assault seriously.

http://www.islandpacket.com/2011/11/29/1879908/military-rape-charges-lead-to.html

  • Rape Shield Law – prevents the alleged victim of a sexual assault from having her past sexual behavior an issue in court. Cathy Young, writing for reason magazine, highlights the problems of such a law.

– In 1998, Jovanovic was convicted of attacking Barnard College student Jamie Rzucek (whose name has been disclosed by some media outlets after the case was dismissed) and was sentenced to a minimum of 15 years in prison. Rzucek claimed that Jovanovic held her captive in his apartment for 20 hours and subjected her to torture and sexual abuse. The defense argued that there was no torture — Rzucek’s claim that Jovanovic forcibly sodomized her was disputed by medical evidence, and the jury returned a not-guilty verdict on the counts pertaining to this act — and that the bondage was consensual. This argument was crippled by Judge William Wetzel’s decision to exclude portions of the e-mail correspondence between Jovanovic and Rzucek in which she discussed her adventures in sadomasochism, including her sadomasochistic relationship with another man. The messages, the judge held, were inadmissible under New York State’s rape shield law because they had to do with the accuser’s sexual conduct. In late 1999, the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, by a 3-to-1 vote, set aside the conviction on the grounds that Judge Wetzel had applied the rape shield law improperly and left the jury with a “distorted view of the evidence.” The case was sent down for retrial, but Rzucek proved reluctant to testify a second time, and prosecutors eventually sought a dismissal “in the interests of justice.” Jovanovic’s vindication came at a high price: as much as $500,000 in legal fees, not to mention 20 months spent in state penitentiaries. – In Wisconsin in 1993, 18-year-old Charles Steadman was convicted of raping his 22-year-old foster sister Jessica in a he said/she said case in which physical evidence of force was absent and the defendant claimed that the sex was consensual. What the jury didn’t know was that when Jessica filed the complaint, she herself was facing criminal charges of having sex with minors. (She eventually received probation with mandatory psychiatric treatment.) Clearly, this gave her a reason to lie — particularly since she had had sexual relations with Steadman when he was underage. She might have thought that being a victim would improve her legal situation as a defendant, or she might have worried that if her encounter with Steadman became known, she would get in more trouble with the law. None of these possible motives could be introduced at Steadman’s trial, since Jessica’s legal problems were related to her past sexual activities and hence inadmissible. http://reason.com/archives/2002/02/01/excluded-evidence False Rape:

  • The infamous Eugene Kanin study found a 41% false rape figure in a small metropolitan community. A follow up study, found 50% of rape allegations in college to be false. Among the false charges, 53% of the women admitted they filed the false claim as an alibi.

http://falserapearchives.blogspot.com/2009/06/archives-of-sexual-behavior-feb-1994.html http://www.archive.org/details/FalseRapeAllegations

  • US Air force study confirms 60% of rapes to be false, a full 27% of the allegations were confirmed to be false because the woman admitted to making them up.

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm The above link comes from a Forensic website, not a biased feminist one, and concludes the following: Empirical evidence does not support the widespread belief that women are extremely unlikely to make false accusations of male sexual misconduct.  Rather the research on accusations of rape, sexual harassment, incest, and child sexual abuse indicates that false accusations have become a serious problem.  The motivations involved in making a false report are widely varied and include confusion, outside influence from therapists and others, habitual lying, advantages in custody disputes, financial gain, and the political ideology of radical feminism. From report: The McDowell recruited independent reviewers who were given 25 criteria derived from the profiles of the women who openly admitted making a false allegation. If all three reviewers agreed that the rape allegation was false, it was then listed by that description. The result: 60% of the accusations were identified as false. McDowell also took his study outside the military by examining police files from a major Midwestern and a southwestern city. He found that the finding of 60% held

  • Also here is a Q and A with Mcdowell:

In an interview in the June 1985 issue of Chicago Lawyer, McDowell told Rob Warden, the editor. Q: How was the model developed? A: It is based on a study of 1,218 cases that were initially investigated as rapes. Of those, 460 were proven rapes, 212 were disproved allegations, and 546 cases remain unresolved. Q: What were your criteria for classifying a rape accusation as disproved? A: There was just one criterion. In each case, the victim ultimately admitted that the allegation was a hoax. Q: All 212 of those cases are now admitted to have been false allegations? A: Yes. That’s the reason that we have a leftover category of 546 cases. My personal opinion, based on the evidence, is that many of those also are false allegations. But they are not admitted hoaxes, and we have not classified them as disproved. We have been extremely conservative in classifying an allegation as false for purposes of the study. Q: What were your criteria for classifying an allegation as proved? Are these all convictions? A: They’re not all convictions. Some are, but the remainder is cases in which the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence supports the allegation so strongly that there really is no other logical conclusion. Q: Then your standard for classifying an allegation is false? A: Definitely. If there was a margin for error, if there was any area in which we gave the benefit of any doubt, it was in favor of a rape.” http://www.falserape.net/falserapeafa.htm

  • Colorado’s Craig Silverman – a rape prosecutor – said the following about false reports:

“During my time as a prosecutor who made case filing decisions, I was amazed to see all the false rape allegations that were made to the Denver Police Department. It was remarkable and surprising to me. You would have to see it to believe it. Any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape is one of the most falsely reported crimes that there is. A command officer in the Denver police sex assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at approximately 45 percent.” http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=573

  • “Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where results could be obtained, the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing. Specifically, FBI officials report that out of roughly 10,000 sexual assault cases since 1989, about 2,000 tests have been inconclusive, about 2,000 tests have excluded the primary suspect, and about 6,000 have “matched” or included the primary suspect.”

The authors continued, “These percentages have remained constant for 7 years, and the National Institute of Justice’s informal survey of private laboratories reveals a strikingly similar 26 percent exclusion rate.” “If the foregoing results can be extrapolated, then the rate of false reports is roughly between 20 (if DNA excludes an accused) to 40 percent (if inconclusive DNA is added). The relatively low estimate of 25 to 26 percent is probably accurate, especially since it is supported by other sources.” http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194032,00.html

  • In addition the SAVE survey reveals false accusations (of all kinds) to be a real problem.

“A full 11% of respondents reported that they themselves had been falsely accused of some type of intimate partner or child abuse, and that they had been to some extent or another sanctioned for behavior that they never engaged in.” Over eight of ten (81%) who said that they knew someone falsely accused answered that the falsely accused party was male. Nearly seven in ten (69.9%) of those falsely accusing were female. These results indicate very strongly that false accusations and their aftermath loom very large in the landscape of men’s lives. And while there are falsely accused females out there, the issue is one that can be fairly identified as generally an act of aggression against men Here are the results:

  1. Have you ever heard of anyone falsely accused of abuse? Yes – 51.6% No – 48.4%
  2. Has anyone you know ever been falsely accused of abuse? Yes – 15.5% No – 84.5%
  3. Was this person falsely accused of child abuse?* Yes – 74.0% No – 26.0%
  4. Was this person falsely accused of domestic violence?* Yes – 28.9% No – 71.1%
  5. Was this person falsely accused of sexual abuse?* Yes – 48.5% No – 51.5%
  6. Was this person falsely accused in the last year? Yes – 17.7% N0 – 82.3%
  7. Was the falsely accused person a male? Yes – 81.0% No – 19.0%
  8. Was the accuser a female? Yes – 69.9% No – 30.1%
  9. Was the accusation made as part of a child custody dispute? Yes – 25.8% No – 74.2%
  10. Have you been falsely accused? Yes – 11.0% No – 89.0%

http://www.saveservices.org/falsely-accused/survey/ The Innocence project reveals false accusations of rape to be the most common form of false imprisonment. http://www.innocenceproject.org/ Rape allegations, that are proven to be false, account for 17% of all allegations in the military. Note that the majority of rape cases fall into a “grey” area, where the could be true or false, so the 17% number is likely higher. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/12/false-reports-outpace-sex-assaults-in-the-military/ Click to see some examples of what false rape allegations can do Boy Crisis Boys are twice as likely to be diagnosed with “ADHD” as girls. Boys represent 70% of the D and F students. 11th-grade boys now write at the same level as 8th-grade girls. Boys commit suicide at 4 times the rate girls do. Today, women outnumber men on 57% of campuses and enjoy a 3:2 ratio overall. By 2020, men’s enrollment is projected as low as 41.4%, down from 57.7% in 1970. Boys are five times more likely to end up in Juvenile detention. Boys are far more likely to be victims of a violent crime. http://collegestats.org/articles/2012/08/9-signs-we-have-a-boy-crisis/ Boy_Crisis_Chart

Despite these statistics, it is girls who still receive all of the gender specific goodies. Female only scholarships, White House Council for Women and Girls, Title IX grant program for women in STEM, and the Women’s Educational Equity Act are the known Federal level programs for women and girls in school. Sentencing Disparity

  • Average sentences for same crime under similar circumstances (robbed someone with a gun, knife, etc):

Female – 18.51 months Male – 51.52 months http://www.terry.uga.edu/~mustard/sentencing.pdf In Britain, Judges are now ordered to “show more mercy” on female criminals when deciding what sentence they should be given. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html

  • Unfair sentencing doesn’t just pertain to men, but for boys as well.

Judge bashes Probation Department for gender bias in favor of leniency for girlshttp://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-12-01/news/27082827_1_gender-bias-probation-officers-probation-department

  • In North Carolina (and probably other states), it turns out that assaulting a female is a class A1 misdemeanor only if the attacker is “a male person at least 18 years of age”; every other type of assault when it comes to gender, is generally a class 2 misdemeanor. This can translate into a substantial difference in sentencing.

http://volokh.com/2011/10/05/north-carolina-crime-of-assault-on-a-female/ Click to see examples of Female Sentencing Discount Death Penalty almost exclusively targets men Actual execution of female offenders is rare, with only 571 documented instances as of 12/31/2011, beginning with the first in 1632. These executions constitute about 2.9% of the total of confirmed executions in the US since 1608. Only twelve female offenders have been executed since 1976. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/women-and-death-penalty#facts Women make up only 2.9% of those executed since 1976, but they commit 10% of all murder in the US. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded/expandhomicidemain Domestic violence SUMMARY:  This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600. http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm In addition; “the most comprehensive review of the scholarly domestic violence research literature ever conducted concludes, among other things, that women perpetrate physical and emotional abuse, and engage in control behaviors, at comparable rates to men.” http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10741752.htm?PID=4003003 Domestic Violence Hotlines/Shelters (tax dollar funded), refuse to help or accept male victims of DV. What happens when men call Domestic Violence shelters for help: Of the abused men who called domestic violence hotlines, 64% were told that they “only helped women.” In 32% of the cases, the abused men were referred to batterers’ programs. Another 25% were given a phone number to call that turned out to be a batterers’ program. A little over a quarter of them were given a reference to a local program that helped. Overall, only 8% of the men who called hotlines classified them as “very helpful,” whereas 69% found them to be “not at all helpful.” Sixteen percent said the people at the hot line “dismissed or made fun of them.” One abused man said: They laughed at me and told me I must have done something to deserve it if it happened at all. Another said: They asked how much I weighed and how much she weighed and then hung up on me…I was told by this agency that I was full of BS. Twelve percent of the hotlines accused the man of being the batterer or responsible for the abuse. One abused man said: They told me women don’t commit domestic violence — it must have been my fault. Another said: They accused me of trying to hide my “abuse” of her by claiming to be a victim, and they said that I was nothing more than a wimp. Of the men who sought help by contacting local domestic violence programs, only 10% found them to be “very helpful,” whereas 65% found them to be “not at all helpful.” One abused man said: They just laughed and hung up the phone. Another said: They didn’t really listen to what I said. They assumed that all abusers are men and said that I must accept that I was the abuser. They ridiculed me for not leaving my wife, ignoring the issues about what I would need to do to protect my six children and care for them. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/3977-researcher-what-hap-3977 Mandatory arrest policy Thanks to the Violence Against Women Act, states are encouraged to enact “mandatory arrest” policies when it comes to domestic violence. This means that when someone calls the police alleging partner abuse, an arrest has to be made, even if the allegation looks to be false. Mandatory arrest policies completely ignore a Constitutional right known as “Probable Cause.” http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/why-would-anyone-oppose-the-violence-against-women-act/273103/ Arrest the male Thanks to “predominant aggressor” (aka arrest the male no matter what) policies, men who call the police on their violent wife are often the ones arrested, or threatened by police with arrest.

  • According to a study by George and Yarwood (2004), police have threatened 47% of male victims of intimate partner violence with arrest. George and Yarwood also found that the police ignored 35% of male victims and 21% were actually arrested instead of the female perpetrators

http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/pdfs/carolettaijcjs2010vol5iss1.pdf

  • Another Study by Linda Kelly found that when abused men call the police to report domestic violence committed against them they are three times more likely to be arrested than the wife that is abusing them.

http://www.law.fsu.edu/Journals/lawreview/downloads/304/kelly.pdf A good example of this is the case of Pro Fooballer Warren Moon. Moon was arrested after he tried to restrain his wife from assaulting him after she threw a candlestick at this head and kneed him in the groin. Police came, arrested moon and he was charged with domestic violence but only acquitted after his wife confessed that she was the violent one. Women’s groups were not happy and wanted Moon to be charged. Child Custody Women receive custody of the children in about 84% of custody cases http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p60-225.pdf Paternity Fraud Paternity fraud is rampant in the US.  In as many as 30% of cases, fathers are being forced to pay child support for children who are not theirs. http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/ Click for examples of men being forced to pay CS for non-biological children Boys Forced to Pay Child Support to their Rapist In at least 3 states (California, Kansas and Tennessee), courts force boys to pay child support to their statutory rapists. In at least two other states, state officials attempt to get boy statutory rape victims to pay child support to their rapists.  http://www.ageofconsent.com/comments/numberthirtysix.htm http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/legally-obscene/ Click to see examples of boys being forced to pay CS to their rapists False Restraining Orders Restraining orders are usually as simple to get as filling out a form correctly. In 2005, Santa Fe District Judge Daniel Sanchez issued a temporary restraining order against David Letterman because, in her words: Colleen Nestler alleged in her request for the order filed Dec. 15 that the Late Show host had forced her to go bankrupt and caused her “mental cruelty” and “sleep deprivation” since first sending her secret messages in May 1994. Nestler asked the court to require Letterman to keep a distance of at least three yards and to “release me from his mental harassment and hammering.”  She received this restraining order based on no proof of her ridiculous allegations. http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1144343,00.html Temporary restraining orders are issued by judges without the respondent having legal representation, being allowed to present opposing evidence, or even being aware of the allegation. Thanks to state laws that have been lobbied to redefine “domestic violence” broadly, restraining orders are extremely easy to obtain. Judges also rarely require proof of abuse, and the statutes invoke a “preponderance of evidence” standard (the same standard forced onto colleges in rape cases). In most states a temporary restraining order is followed by a full hearing 10-14 days later; at that time, a final determination is reached. In practice restraining orders trample on Civil Rights of the defendants.

  • The accuser may have had weeks to prepare for the case, and is probably receiving free legal help. In contrast, the respondent has only a few days to find a lawyer and develop a legal strategy.
  • The respondent has limited access to evidence in the home that he may need to prove his innocence.
  • If the respondent has no money for legal defense then they may be forced to undertake more difficult pro se defense.

One attorney noted that “the mere allegation of domestic violence…may shift the burden of proof on the defendant.” Take this court transcript from a hearing in which the respondent’s attorney requested the temporary restraining order to be removed: Attorney to his respondent-client: “Can you please state your name and your address for the record?” Judge: “I don’t believe I need to hear any evidence from your client. I’m going to deny your request to vacate the restraining order.” http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/correct-the-violence-against-women-act-now Concerns about the misuse and unconstitutionality of Restraining Orders have been voiced in legal circles for years.

  • Elaine Epstein, former Massachusetts Bar Association, admitted “Everyone knows that restraining orders and orders to vacate are granted to virtually all who apply…In many cases, allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage.”
  • In Connecticut, attorney, Arnold Rutkin said that many judges view TOs as a “rubber-stamping exercise” and that subsequent hearings “are usually a sham.”
  • In Missouri, a survey of attorneys and judges found many complaints of disregard for due process and noted that allegations of domestic violence were widely used as a “litigation strategy.”
  • In Illinois, an article in the state legal journal described legal allegations of abuse as “part of the gamesmanship of divorce.”
  • In California, the State Bar admits it is concerned that protective orders are “almost routinely issued by the court in family law proceedings even when there is relatively meager evidence and usually without notice to the restrained person…it is troubling that they appear to be sought more and more frequently for retaliation and litigation purposes.”

In Washington State a TO reads: “IT IS THEREFORE OREDERED THAT…The respondent is directed to appear and show cause why this temporary order should not be made effective for one year or more and why the court should not order the relief requested by the petitioner or other relief which may include electronic monitoring, payment of costs, and treatment. Temporary restraining orders have been called “the gamesmanship of divorce.” One account to how damaging a false TO can be: “In ten days, the hypothetical husband has gone from having a normal life with a wife, children and home to being a social pariah, homeless, poor, and alone, trapped in a Kafkaesque nightmare.” The following is a case account by a grandmother of the victim of a false TO of how a woman can abuse the system in her favor to get the father out of THEIR children’s lives. In November 2002 Mrs. Soucie’s daughter-in-law decided to leave the family home, and opted to take along her nine-month-old grandson for good measure. “With the slow process of the court system, my grandson was concealed for 3 months. We missed his first Thanksgiving, first Christmas, first New Years, and his first birthday,” Mrs. Soucie sadly writes. Finally the father, who works in law enforcement, was granted formal visitation rights. That’s when the nightmare began.   Somehow the mother got irate because dad and grandma wanted to see junior from time to time. And someone told her that under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act, causing a woman to feel even “emotional distress” is considered a form of abuse. “In October 2003, my son and myself were placed under an Order of Protection. We did nothing to break the law, we did not harass, stalk, intimidate, or try to annoy. Our only purpose was to pick up the child and deliver him back at the appointed time.”   Apparently the mother told the judge she found dad and grandma picking up the child to be “distressing.” The mother has learned the system and uses it to her advantage,” laments the disillusioned grandmother. http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2005/0810roberts.html Box 1 – indicates there was no allegation of physical abuse. Instead, the wife accused her husband of “harassment” and “interference with personal liberty.” Box 5 – on the basis of those allegations, the female shall receive custody of the children. Box 7 – Orders that the children be removed from their father and allowed to see him only every other weekend until 6pm on Sunday. Restraining-Order-791x1024 50% – the number of restraining orders that are given without so much as an allegation of physical abuse 70% – the estimated number of restraining orders that are false based on several studies by state. http://www.saveservices.org/camp/faam-2011/false-accusations-of-domestic-violence-by-the-numbers/ Of 302 men who experienced domestic violence by their wives, 38.7% reported that she filed a restraining order against him under false pretenses. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913504/ Click to see examples of False Restraining Orders Title IX crushing Men’s sports programs Title IX, once a gender equality law, has now morphed into a gender quota law that demands ‘proportionality’ when it comes to sports programs in college. Technically Title IX has three prongs of compliance, but the “safe harbor” prong has always been proportionality and it guarantees colleges will not be gone after by the OCR or the many whiny women’s groups. Because of these facts, the US commission on civil rights finally decided to weigh in and recommend Title IX be reformed to stem what it called the “unnecessary reduction of men’s athletic opportunities.” http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/2010-04-01-title-ix_N.htm?csp=obinsite Click to see Title IX ruining Men’s sports Scholarship Discrimination In sports where the gender compete, girls are awarded far more scholarships than boys are: 20,206 vs 32,656. Because of this, in every ‘gender symmetric’ sport (the one exception being gymnastics), boys face much more difficult odds of being able to earn a scholarship than girls do. http://collegesportscouncil.org/newsroom/display_releases.cfm?id=28 http://www.collegesportscouncil.org/20090715.pdf Hate Crime Discrimination The DOJ will only investigate bullying cases if the victim is considered protected under the 1964 Civil Rights legislation. In other words, white males are the only group to be excluded from having their case investigated by the DOJ. http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2011/mar/18/doj-white-male-bullying-victims-tough-luck/ War Dead  – 99.9% male deaths http://thewall-usa.com/information.asp http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf Workplace Deaths 92% of workplace deaths are male. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf Suicide Men are almost 80% of suicide victims. http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/victims/qa02702.asp?qaDate=2009 Homicide Men are overwhelmingly more likely to be victims of homicide http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2221 Male Rape “In 2011-12, an estimated 4.0% of state and federal prison inmates and 3.2% of jail inmates reported experiencing one or more incidents of sexual victimization by another inmate or facility staff in the past 12 months or since admission to the facility, if less than 12 months.” http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svpjri1112.pdf Homelessness 62% of the homeless in the US are male. http://humanneeds.vcu.edu/Page.aspx?nav=29&scope=0&source=13 Men have zero reproductive rights Circumcision Girls are protected under law from circumcision, boys are not (his body, not his choice). Conscription Selective service is required only of men, and participation is tied directly to voting rights. Women have no such demand, associated with voting rights or otherwise.






I wont post the text and links but you can also check the fathers4justice fact sheet http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/about-f4j/fact-sheet/ I will end this post with something a bit more amusing, ( and a bit over the top but who cares). So for those that wonder why we call feminists feminazis, I suggest that you read the following. (taken from http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm )

Feminism and Nazism

Why do anti-feminists keep insisting that feminism and Nazism are very similar? Well. The reason is this. The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists. Furthermore, feminist and Nazi ideology have a lot in common. Very occasionally I receive an email saying that it is outrageous to compare feminism with Nazism – because it somehow trivialises the terrible experiences of the Jews in the Germany of the 1930s. But making this comparison does not do this at all. It does the opposite. It brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and demonisation. Furthermore, most Jewish groups do not actually highlight the holocaust in order to gain everybody’s sympathy. They do it so that people can ****LEARN!**** They do it so that people can see if something heinous is creeping up on us. Anyway. Here are 30 similarities between feminism and ‘early’ Nazism. Feminism and Nazism have both …

  1. discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code.

  2. promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally, e.g. see  biologist Professor Steve Jones Men Bear a Striking Resemblance to Slugs.

  3. promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as ‘parasites’, e.g. see Professor Steven Jones – ALL Men Are Parasites

  4. promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed e.g. see What A Piece Of Sht Is Man

  5. promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated e.g. Bobbit jokes; e.g. see What A Piece Of Sht Is Man.

  6. demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals, e.g. see Home Office Rape Statistics Are False

  7. sought to break the target group away from their families e.g. seeThe Trojan Horses Of Feminism

  8. promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society. e.g. see Do Not Respect Them

  9. disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology, e.g. seeMsinformation by Professor Christina Hoff Sommers

  10. disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters, e.g. see AH’s Did Women Really Want To Go Out To Work?

  11. used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out e.g. see Feminists are nasty things.

  12. promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent ‘victims’ of the targeted group e.g. “women have been oppressed throughout history.” e.g. see Dr Lewis Wolpert: The Differences Between Men and Women

  13. demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women

  14. discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace e.g. see Well Done the Girls?

  15. perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts; e.g. see Are Our Family Court Judges Fit To Be Judges?

  16. arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases.

  17. arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to ‘prove’ their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases; e.g. see Kevin Driscoll Is Innocent Of Rape

  18. arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed ‘a crime’, e.g. where nowadays the ‘feelings’ of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes ‘a crime’ e.g. see The Real Goal Of Feminism by Antonia Feitz – 18 min

  19. arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her – at her whim – to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby – with all the ramifications of this – regardless of how the father might feel about it all e.g. see Rant Against the Child Support Agency. (Also sexual harassment etc.)

  20. arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases.

  21. arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support e.g. see Paternity Fraud – A terrible violation, but no punishment.

  22. arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency – and were often actually applauded for their actions, e.g. see Killer given domestic violence award and Loose Women.

  23. arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences – e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment; e.g. see Ignoring Relationships In Rape

  24. arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody.

  25. arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased ‘hate speech’ laws.

  26. punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.

  27. effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology; e.g. see BBC Injects Political Correctness Even Into Science Programmes

  28. consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group e.g. see Oxford Ladies

  29. ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women’s Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group.

  30. persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. “A women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” “Men think about sex every 15 seconds.”; e.g. see Permanent Menstrual Tension?

Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers – which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power – feminism and early Nazism are surely very similar indeed.

07/07/03

Hermann Goering

Hermann Goering … “The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”  Feminists … “The people can always be brought to the bidding of the feminist leaders. All you have to do is tell them that women and children are being attacked (by men) and denounce those who protest as ‘supporters of abuse’ and for exposing women and children to danger. It works the same way in any country.” Feminism. Nazism. Nazism. Feminism. The ‘best interests of the child’ … “The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.” Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf Feminism. Nazism. Nazism. Feminism.

November 2010 Irish Income Tax Cut Only For Women The IMF’s plan to cut women’s income tax rate by five percentage points could raise Ireland’s GDP as well as tackle inequality. Yep; it is now being proposed that men on lower pay should subsidise women on higher pay – even though men put far more into the government pot than do women, and even though they get less out of it. And yet, purely on the basis of their genetic code, it is being said that men should pay even more. The Jews must pay higher tax rates than the Germans.






UPDATE 6/7/2015

All the content on this update is from the site http://www.fighting4fair.com/

from http://www.fighting4fair.com/uncategorized/deep-down-in-places-feminists-dont-talk-about-at-parties/

Deep down in places feminists don’t talk about at parties (‘pussy cartel’)

Basically it talks about the shaming women do so the market value of their pussy wont drop and we have the science to back it up!

This theme is explored further in the following papers:

Author Tells Women to Use Their “P*ssy Power” to Get the Men They Want (6 April 2015)

Study reveals price plays exclusive part in women’s approval of sexualy explicit advertisements (9 December 2013)

Seems like its women who mostly slut-shame (27 September 2014)

You can’t get laid in the United States (26 September 2011)

http://theumlaut.com/2013/07/02/the-economics-of-slut-shaming/

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/09/03/sex-cartel/

http://www.reddit.com/r/bestof/comments/20ptr7/stormblade260_explains_why_people_think_women/

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/yasmin-alibhai-brown/yasmin-alibhaibrown-women-without-any-rights-know-all-about-erotic-capital-2341700.html

http://www.the-niceguy.com/articles/SupplyDemand.html

http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/07/08/sexual-economics/

Gender hypocrisy in porn debate (25 September 2013) This article was also reproduced in the AVfM web site with readers comments (some quite funny)

Intimate partner sexual abuse (3 August 2014)

Feminism’s homophobic roots – demanding compulsory heterosexuality because homosexuality oppresses women (A discussion thread on reddit/mensrights, July 2014) One reads little about the relationship between feminism and gay males, although there are quite a few gay male MRA.

Women should masturbate but men who do are lonely creeps

They’re afraid of men masturbating (20 September 2010)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nica-noelle/are-women-sexually-oppressing-men_b_5582485.html

Reddit discussion thread on slut-shaming

A Cold War fought by women, The New York Times (18 November 2013)

Women call other women sluts to guard their social standing: Study (29 May 2014)

After looking a little more at the site it is impossible for me to look at everything so I am copy pasting the catalog of all the articles which can be found when you first enter the site. Each subject has a fuckton of sources and links inside, and I wont post them here to avoid duplicates. Anyhow he has done a great job and I highly suggest to  go visit his site. http://www.fighting4fair.com/

Table of Contents

‘Prawn of the Patriarchy’ is both a personal blog and a resource for those seeking information on a range of gender-related issues.

(Trigger warning for feminists and SJW: Be advised that much of the material provided within this blog runs contrary to the feminist narrative)

The topics encompassed by this blog are as follows:

Domestic violence
Sex, sexuality and sexual violence
Men’s and boys health
Partnering, marriage and fatherhood
Gender in the workplace
Institutional bias against men & boys
Gender in the media
Feminism and key elements of the feminist narrative
Feminist censorship and retribution
The Men’s Rights Movement

Domestic violence

Domestic violence: Overview and statistics

Domestic violence is not a gendered issue – Why the pervasive sexist bias against men?

On recognising and supporting male victims of domestic violence

Fudging the figures to support the feminist narrative

Australian feminist attacks integrity of advocacy group for male victims of domestic violence

Finessing definitions to preserve the image of female victimhood

On false allegations of sexual assault and/or domestic abuse

Mostly female perpetrators, so child abuse is a gendered crime then?

More assaults at aged care homes

This is what a lie looks like (“overwhelming majority”)

On violence carried out by women and girls

Fact or Factoid: A woman hospitalised every three hours due to DV

Domestic violence: DV-related organisations (government and private)

So what exactly is the ‘Domestic Violence Industry’?

Two awareness campaigns. Only one can be criticised. Cowed by feminism?

White Ribbon campaign to men: Stand up! Speak up! Shut up!

The White Ribbon Campaign that addresses part of the problem Vs. The White Ribbon Campaign that addresses all of the problem

White Ribbon Australia acknowledges male victims and invites communication (credibility trigger warning)

Some further thoughts regarding the White Ribbon Campaign (feminist version)

Domestic Violence NSW censors dissenting views (before lapsing into paranoid delusion)

‘DV Connect’ is “non-judgemental” (but men calling their helpline are sneaky perpetrators)

‘Our Watch’: DV advocacy or shrill mouthpiece for gender feminism?

Feminist advocacy group ‘Our Watch’ seeks shield from public scrutiny

‘Our Watch’: Just how heartless (or deeply in denial) can people be?

Addressing systemic gender bias in the WA Department for Child Protection and Family Support

*That* West Australian Government DV Helpline web page – Some further background

Gender bias at the Australian Department of Social Services

NSW feminist groups seek to roll back reform of domestic violence shelters

Domestic violence: Public inquiries

My submission to the Australian Government Inquiry into Domestic Violence

My submission to the Premier’s Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland

My response to the report of the Queensland Task Force on Family Violence

Minister Fentiman’s response to my concerns regarding the ‘Not Now, Not Ever: Putting an end to domestic and family violence in Queensland’ report

Yet another Australian inquiry into domestic violence (Victoria)

My submission to the Victorian Royal Commission on Family Violence(May 2015)

Domestic violence: Public attitudes and DV in the media

Differing public response to partner violence depending on gender of victim

ABC Q&A program highlights gender inequality within the domestic violence debate

Readers at ‘The Conversation’ call for an end to feminist bias and censorship

Going Batty: The making of a champion of the Domestic Violence Industry

Female aggression now increasingly seen as acceptable, empowering even

Hope Solo case exemplifies rank hypocrisy re: domestic violence

A busy few weeks for gender matters (Aug/Sept 2014)

‘Bristly Woman’ campaign launch

Don’t be that hypocrite

Domestic violence: Other

Sallee McLaren must write on the blackboard “I must not challenge the feminist narrative”

Australian government announces intention to reprogram boys to reduce domestic violence

On the suggestion that women-only police stations might help the fight against domestic violence

Dubious public policy borne from the denial of female violence

Let’s hope the new DV Ministry in New South Wales will achieve something more than a triumph of pandering to the feminist lobby

Feminists claim domestic violence is caused by ‘rigid gender roles and stereotypes’ (then apply them to men in painting them as perpetual aggressors)

Academic paper on gender equality and gender hostility

Sex, sexuality and sexual violence

On sexual assault and unwanted sex

On the feminist myth of ‘rape culture’

‘Mattress Girl’ and some other recent notable campus rape allegations

Finessing definitions to preserve the image of female victimhood

On the issue of consent

On false allegations of sexual assault and/or domestic abuse

Regarding female perpetration of paedophilia and underage sex

Denying female perpetration of sex crimes – The Mercier Affair

On women attracted to guys with partners

On sex, sexuality and sluts

Girls showing their bits = empowerment? patriarchal exploitation? self-indulgence? other?

Don’t look at me! No wait. Look at me!

Only men ogle – yeah right!

On prostitution

Deep down in places that feminists don’t talk about at parties (‘pussy cartel’)

Will fembots be a game changer?

Human trafficking of men and boys & other hidden sexual violence against males

On the issue of traveller safety

On the sexualisation of children

Men’s and boys health

On men’s health: The statistics and the underlying factors

Is it my imagination or does media coverage of mens health initiatives usually focus on male shaming?

One charity’s perplexing response to a potential source of donations

Funding for Sydney men’s health service axed

Another double-standard: Genital mutilation

The men’s shed movement: A little bit ‘rad’ and a little bit sad

Partnering, marriage and fatherhood

The ‘Marriage Strike’ and MGTOW

Don’t look at me! No wait. Look at me!

Nice guys, nice guys™ and the friendzone

Good manners versus chivalry

On fathers and their children

Two days each year to celebrate men

Men and women and their increasingly divergent attitudes to parenthood

We’ve all heard of the gender ‘income gap’, but what about the ‘expense gap’?

Western men with Asian women: Gender relations through a different frame of reference

On Australian men seeking foreign partners

Gender in the workplace

How feminists misrepresent the gender ‘income gap’

That tired old feminist chestnut that is the ‘gender wage gap’ resurrected in Australia

We’ve all heard of the gender ‘income gap’, but what about the ‘expense gap’?

Companies with women at the helm perform better (so they say)

Harassment and discrimination in the workplace: Surprise, surprise, it goes both ways

#shirtstorm

Less than 50/50 representation does not automatically imply ‘gender bias’

Recruitment bias favours hiring female staff

On affirmative action and the imposition of gender quotas

Institutional bias against men & boys

Profound gender bias at the Australian Human Rights Commission

George Brandis declines opportunity to address bias at the Australian Human Rights Commission

Australian taxpayer-funded organisations that do little/nothing for men (other than demonising them)

When even the Prime Minister’s office imposes pro-feminist censorship …

Addressing systemic gender bias in the WA Department for Child Protection and Family Support

*That* West Australian Government DV Helpline web page – Some further background

Gender bias at the Australian Department of Social Services

White Ribbon Day – Parliament House Library says dissenting voices “deemed not to be relevant”

Australian Government cuts back funding to advocacy groups, except feminist ones

On the punishment of women and the notion of a ‘pussy-pass’

Just how heartless (or deeply in denial) can people be? (domestic violence)

The trouble with boys and learning

Gender in the media

Persistent pro-feminist and anti-male bias in the mainstream media

How men are portrayed … Haw Haw Haw! The jokes on us

Regarding online harassment

How tragic that feminists ignore their role in demonising men

#SydneySiege reporting showcases further examples of feminist hypocrisy

Contrasting media reaction when mums and dads kill their children

Bring back our girls! (The ‘Empathy Gap’)

Deconstructing pro-feminist articles in news.com.au

Readers at ‘The Conversation’ call for an end to feminist bias and censorship (domestic violence)

Moderator zaps post, but for once it wasn’t (just) mine

The ‘Sunrise’ Strippergate episode

‘Sunrise’ TV crew stir up the feminists again

‘Sunrise’ TV show offers sop to feminists

‘Sunrise’ provides equal time for feminism and men rights

Good news: Males acknowledged on morning TV (not in a bad way)

Seeking a news source without feminist bias

Feminism and key elements of the feminist narrative

About feminism & feminist antipathy towards issues faced by men

Not all feminists are like that (NAFALT)

Not our fault so who we gonna blame? The (scary scary) patriarchy!

If the central tenet of feminism is equality then what mens/boys causes have feminists championed recently?

Men’s studies = bad/negative but Women’s studies = good/positive

Are feminists truly committed to equality for all women and girls?

To feminists ‘Equality’ is just a marketing ploy to get what they really want

Denying female perpetration of sex crimes – The Mercier Affair

Privilege, respect, entitlement … and humour

If feminists have a genuine case then what’s with all the distortion, lies and exaggeration?

#HeForShe: Men pressed into service with nary a hint of ‘quid pro quo’

Less than 50/50 representation does not automatically imply ‘gender bias’

On Gender Traitors, White Knights and Manginas

Dissing shy guys and fat women: Yep, another feminist double-standard

Do feminists have any male heroes?

On feminists, white feathers and Anzac Day

Good manners versus chivalry

Feminists aiming to strengthen their foothold in Thailand

Feminism and Buddhism

Feminist censorship and retribution

On the censorship of non-feminist perspectives and opinions

Hiding the visible signs of dissent. Because we’re worth it

The Guardian publishes article about the awfulness of people being silenced online, and then silences me

Beware the ire of an angry feminist

The Unbearable Lameness of Being

Domestic Violence NSW censors dissenting views (before lapsing into paranoid delusion)

White Ribbon Day – Parliament House Library says dissenting voices “deemed not to be relevant”

I am not a feminist

#shirtstorm

The Elliot Rodger tragedy co-opted as a feminist bandwagon

White Ribbon Australia acknowledges male victims and invites communication (credibility trigger warning)

Karen Straughan and others on feminist shaming tactics

Readers at ‘The Conversation’ call for an end to feminist bias and censorship (domestic violence)

More about the ‘moderation’ of comments at ‘The Conversation’

‘Ironic Misandry’ flunks the test

#womenagainstfeminism

On the inability to cope with criticism in a mature manner (You disagree with me = You hate women)

Feminist efforts to shut down, disrupt and/or denigrate the 2014 Conference on Mens Issues

What George Will wrote – and what happened next

The Men’s Rights Movement

Mens human rights activism: A growing tide of men and women saying “Enough is enough!”

Criticism and negative portrayal of the men’s rights movement

Dealing with mens issues – The current situation in Australia

Australian political parties and their view on feminism & men’s rights: The Family First Party

Feminist efforts to shut down, disrupt and/or denigrate the 2014 Conference on Mens Issues

International Conference on Men’s Issues 2015 (Houston, TX, October 29-31)

The ‘Marriage Strike’ and MGTOW

Two days each year to celebrate men

Men’s studies = bad/negative but Women’s studies = good/positive

Interesting perspectives from a poster named ‘Bowspearer’

On being male or female

Men and women playing together nicely

How men are portrayed … Haw Haw Haw! The jokes on us

Men do more of most things … get a target painted on their backs

Women are held accountable for … (say hello to the Teflon Gender)

What guys want

On being male or female (incl. innate differences, stereotyping and so on)

I thought women were meant to be more empathetic?






Small note in the last two years I have found even more examples but I am tired and I have been working on the post for hours so I will update another time. Have a nice day I am S.

6/7/2015 EDIT: I have added a lot of material from the site http://www.fighting4fair.com/

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Master list for anti-feminism.

  1. Several of your hyperlinks in the article are dead. Always save pdf copies of important feminist declarations where they reveal their bigotry because organizations like National Organization for Women will kill all of those links once they see MRAs ot anti-feminists linking to the articles from their website. Create an Issuu.com or Scribd.com file hosting account and upload pdfs of the articles and post links to the uloaded articles in your blog, that way N.O.W and other feminist groups cannot get away with tossing information down the memory hold. The Way Back Machine is ok but sometimes it doesn’t catch the articles before they are deleted.

    Like

    1. well what I did was to take all the major lists and combine them into one giant one. There are thousands of links and to check them would take hours, and sadly for me I will do it, thanks for telling.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s